Timeline for Should we describe the process of brewing a single cup via pouring water over ground coffee as pour-over-coffee or drip-coffee?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2015 at 20:32 | comment | added | AviD | Oh and just to make things fun, "pour-over" / "drip" coffee here is colloquially known as "filter coffee". And the typical coffee pot-style isn't even common enough here at all. | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:05 | comment | added | EdChum | @AviD that's interesting, I think a tag synonym with wiki may be the best bet, I don't like enforcing one's view on another when there is defined term that is not based on territorial differences, it may be unavoidable unfortunately but at least we are discussing this one early | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 10:02 | comment | added | AviD | Ftr, here Hario calls it "pour over". So again, its back to territorialism, even in marketing terms :-( | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 23:05 | history | edited | EdChum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:57 | history | edited | EdChum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:55 | comment | added | mirabilos |
agree on filter coffee for the second one (.de here)
|
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:55 | comment | added | Joshua Aslan Smith | The worry is that since each of the tags discussed other than pour over have 2 meaning in a chain it can get pretty confusing, using the term that is only has one meaning could grant the most clarity. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:51 | history | edited | EdChum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 64 characters in body
|
| Jan 27, 2015 at 22:35 | history | answered | EdChum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |